Becky Kennedy

  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted15 days ago
    This idea of multiplicity—the ability to accept multiple realities at once—is critical to healthy relationships. When there are two people in a room, there are also two sets of feelings, thoughts, needs, and perspectives. Our ability to hold on to multiple truths at once—ours and someone else’s—allows two people in a relationship to feel seen and feel real, even if they are in conflict. Multiplicity is what allows two people to get along and feel close—they each know that their experience will be accepted as true and explored as important, even if those experiences are different. Building strong connections relies on the assumption that no one is right in the absolute, because understanding, not convincing, is what makes people feel secure in a relationship.
    What do I mean by understanding and not convincing? Well, when we seek to understand, we attempt to see and learn more about another person’s perspective, feelings, and experience. We essentially say to that person, “I am having one experience and you are having a different experience. I want to get to know what’s happening for you.” It doesn’t mean you agree or comply (these would imply a “one thing is true” perspective), or that we are “wrong” or our truth doesn’t hold; it means we are willing to put our own experience aside for a moment to get to know someone else’s. When we approach someone with the goal of understanding, we accept that there isn’t one correct interpretation of a set of facts, but rather multiple experiences and viewpoints. Understanding has one goal: connection.
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted15 days ago
    What’s the opposite of understanding? For this argument’s sake, it’s convincing. Convincing is the attempt to prove a singular reality—to prove that “only one thing is true.” Convincing is an attempt to be “right” and, as a result, make the other person “wrong.” It rests on the assumption that there is only one correct viewpoint. When we seek to convince someone, we essentially say, “You’re wrong. You are mis-perceiving, mis-remembering, mis-feeling, mis-experiencing. Let me explain to you why I am correct and then you’ll see the light and come around.” Convincing has one goal in mind: being right. And here’s the unfortunate consequence of being right: the other person feels unseen and unheard, at which point most people become infuriated and combative, because it feels as if the other person does not accept your realness or worth. Feeling unseen and unheard makes connection impossible.
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted15 days ago
    to be mad” line, and your son screams, “Well I am mad! I hate you!” First: ground yourself and internally validate your perspective (“I know I am making a good decision here. I trust myself”). Then, continue to acknowledge your child’s perspective—his truth: “Ugh, I know you are. I know you’re really mad. I get it.” Now, hold your boundary. Feel free to add on when you feel an opening. “There are lots of other movies we can watch, let me know if you want to pick one of those,” or “I wonder if there are any other things we can do tonight that would feel fun?” But remember, you’ve already done what’s necessary, for both of you
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted9 days ago
    Parents express boundaries with both our words and our bodies. When I say “bodies,” I’m not suggesting you use physical force to assert power or intimidate—hurting or scaring your child is never okay. Never never never. But physicality, sometimes, is needed to keep our child safe. If I tell my daughter she cannot hit her brother, I may also need to hold her wrist to prevent the hitting from happening again. If I tell my son that he needs to get off the counter and he struggles to listen, I will have to pick him up—yes, even if he is crying and screaming—and put him back in a safe place. If I need to buckle my child into a car seat on a day she’s screaming, “No no no!,” a boundary will involve my buckling it and maybe restraining her body as I do so. Do I want to have to physically enforce boundaries? No, I’d rather not—I’d prefer working on the core issue of connection and regulation so that my child is more likely to cooperate in the first place (more on this later—lots more). But when things don’t go that way, when things get messy and we have a safety matter at hand, we have to do our job and keep our child safe.
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted9 days ago
    stop crying, that son will associate vulnerability with rejection, even if, later in life, he can’t explicitly recall those memories.
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted9 days ago
    Parent Response #1: “I won’t talk to you while you have a fit. Go to your room and come out when you’re being reasonable!”
    Attachment Lesson #1: When I want something, I push people away, I become bad, I am left abandoned and alone. People only want to be around me when I’m easy and compliant.
  • Alina Maatjes-Siletskayahas quoted8 days ago
    Kids use self-doubt to protect themselves from the overwhelming feelings that would arise if they accepted the reality of what really just happened. They do this because being alone in their feelings seems like “too much,” and self-doubt offers a way to escape and self-preserve.
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)